QAnon’s Triangle of Puppet Masters: The House of Saud Part Two: US-Saudi Relations Before The Purge
Following the introduction to the Saudi Royal family, this is the second episode on the House of Saud and focuses on US-Saudi relations under Barack Obama including both his and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visits to Saudi Arabia as well as both Donald Trump and his Jewish son-in-law Jared Kushner’s visits to the Kingdom in the period between Trump’s inauguration as President and the Purge of supposedly corrupt Saudi princes by Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud on November 4th 2017, which I’ll be dealing with specifically in the next episode of the series.
On the Q Phenomenon (Again)
The QAnon posts I will be referring to date from November 2nd and 3rd 2017 and given that Q is drawing attention to the issue of Saudi Arabia just prior to The Purge, this suggests he really does have insider information. As I will mention later in the video I have questions about Q’s real purpose but don’t really doubt his (or their) authenticity.
I also want to reiterate that my aim in looking into the Q phenomenon is certainly not to become an uncritical member of the Q fan club but rather use his drops as the starting point for my own investigations into certain topics. So far my research has led me to look into the Rothchilds, the Vatican and has forced me to investigate organised paedophilia in the UK. These are all topics I’m bound to return to but the current research into the House of Saud is taking me more in the direction of the geopolitical situation in the Middle East with a particular interest not only in Saudi Arabia and the United States but also Israel.
An advantage of using Q as a starting point is that it is attracting a broader audience to my videos and articles, who might not have been interested had Q not been in the title.
John McCain and Huma Abedin
The first post that mentions Saudi Arabia (in the case using the abbreviation SA) is QAnon 57, which was published on Nov 2 2017, and reads as follows.
Senator McCain and others roundly criticized Rep. Michele Bachmann in 2012 when she and four members of the House Permanent Select Committee Intelligence and the House Judiciary Committee cited Ms. Abedin in letters sent to the Inspectors General of the Department of Defense, Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, warning about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the United States government.
Why is this relevant?
Who took an undisclosed trip to SA?
What was the purpose of a f2f v phone call?
Alice & Wonderland.
Q immediately provided more information about Huma Abedin by immediately posting a link to a The Hill article.
Quote:Anonymous ID: KC17sSpZ No.147661217
Nov 2 2017 15:39:22 (EST)
The Clinton campaign is attempting once again to sweep important questions under the rug about top aide Huma Abedin, her family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to Saudi Arabia, and her role in the ballooning Clinton email scandal.
Her mother, Saleha Abedin, sits on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council for Da’wa and Relief, a group that is chaired by the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
Perhaps recognizing how offensive such ties will be to voters concerned over future terrorist attacks on this country by radical Muslims professing allegiance to Sharia law, the Clinton campaign on Monday tried to downplay Ms. Abedin’s involvement in the Journal and the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Clinton surrogate group Media Matters claimed predictably there was “no evidence” that Ms. Abedin or her family had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and that Trump campaign staffers who spoke of these ties were conspiracy theorists.
To debunk the evidence, Media Matters pointed to a Snopes.com “fact-check” piece that cited as its sole source… Senator John McCain. This is the same John McCain who met Libyan militia leader Abdelkarim Belhaj, a known al Qaeda associate, and saluted him as “my hero” during a 2011 visit to Benghazi.
Regarding the questions, I can only guess but I imagine it reveals the corrupt nature of the Clinton campaign and the involvement of John McCain, who is nominally a member of the opposition Republican party. As Q normally implies the answer to his own questions, one can be reasonably certain that it was John McCain who made an undisclosed visit to Saudi Arabia and that the purpose of the visit was to secure campaign donations from the Saudis without being detected.
I disclosed that the John McCain Institute received more than $1 million from the Saudis in my article John McCain: The Life and Death of an American Traitor and a quick Google search of “John McCain Saudi Arabia” will bring up dozens of eulogies following his death, such as this one in Arab News entitled John McCain: ‘A great friend of Saudi Arabia’ I won’t go into details again but post this picture to remind you of Senator McCain’s involvement in ISIS.
Regarding the Clinton’s, the Clinton Foundation Donation Page shows that that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has donated between $10 and $25 million dollars to the Clintons.
Surely, the Saudis wanted something in return. Liberal journalist Glen Greenwald discusses the hypocrisy of the Clintons in an article in The Intercept entitled Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?
That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.
The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.
Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?
Here’s one of the Clinton Foundation’s principal objectives; decide for yourself if its tyrannical donors are acting with the motive of advancing that charitable goal:
All those who wish to argue that the Saudis donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation out of a magnanimous desire to aid its charitable causes, please raise your hand. Or take the newfound casting of the Clinton Foundation as a champion of LGBTs, and the smearing of its critics as indifferent to AIDS. Are the Saudis also on board with these benevolent missions? And the Qataris and Kuwaitis?
Which is actually more homophobic: questioning the Clinton Foundation’s lucrative relationship to those intensely anti-gay regimes, or cheering and defending that relationship? All the evidence points to the latter. But whatever else is true, it is a blatant insult to everyone’s intelligence to claim that the motive of these regimes in transferring millions to the Clinton Foundation is a selfless desire to help them in their noble work.
Another primary project of the Clinton Foundation is the elimination of wealth inequality, which “leads to significant economic disparities, both within and among countries, and prevents underserved populations from realizing their potential.” Who could possibly maintain that the reason the Qatari and Emirates regimes donated millions to the Clinton Foundation was their desire to eliminate such economic oppression?
It doesn’t exactly take a jaded disposition to doubt that these donations from some of the world’s most repressive regimes are motivated by a desire to aid the Clinton Foundation’s charitable work. To the contrary, it just requires basic rationality. That’s particularly true given that these regimes “have donated vastly more money to the Clinton Foundation than they have to most other large private charities involved in the kinds of global work championed by the Clinton family.” For some mystifying reason, they seem particularly motivated to transfer millions to the Clinton Foundation but not the other charities around the world doing similar work. Why might that be? What could ever explain it?
Bearing in mind that Hillary Clinton’s closest aide (also rumoured to be her lover) is Huma Abedin, one can only guess that the purpose of the Saudi donations was to maintain control and influence over any future US government.
In the very next post, QAnon 59, which was published on Nov 2 2017, Q asks us to contrast Trump’s receival by the Saudi regime to that received by both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. It reads as follows.
How did SA welcome POTUS during his trip?
Why was this historic and not covered by MSM?
How did SA welcome BO during his trip?
How did SA welcome HRC during her trip?
Why is this relevant?
Not suggesting SA is clean by any means but they play a role in this global game of RISK.
Combine all posts and analyze.
The questions provide answers.
Remember, information is everything, the flow of information is no longer controlled by the MSM but by you/others.
Hence, why we are dedicating ‘critical’ time to distribute crumbs which can be followed in greater detail to paint the entire picture once more information is released.
Why has POTUS dedicated so much time into labeling the MSM as fake news?
Why is this relevant?
We are fully prepared that all social media will be shut down to prevent the spread of this information (i.e. POTUS’ Twitter etc. and/or mass censoring).
Sealed Federal orders pre-submitted as prevention and masked as ‘in general’ (though that does not account for rogue agents/programmers within).
Dates (impending actions) are deliberately provided for authenticity.
Alice & Wonderland.
Let’s go back to the first section again. POTUS was received by the Saudis with full honours on his visit in May 2017 but this wasn’t covered by the mainstream media because they don’t want to show Trump in a good light. In fact, he was received with a sword dance, which is traditionally a ceremony reserved for the start of war. Were they indicating to Trump that the Purge was about to begin?
In an article entitled President Trump Receives Royal Welcome In Saudi Arabia, Real Clear Politics has this to say about the visit.
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — President Donald Trump basked in Saudi Arabia’s lavish royal welcome Saturday as he left behind, at least temporarily, the snowballing controversies dogging him in Washington. Trump rewarded his hosts with a $110 billion arms package aimed at bolstering Saudi security and a slew of business agreements.
The visit kicks off an ambitious international debut for Trump. After two days of meetings here, Trump will travel to Israel, have an audience with Pope Francis at the Vatican and meet with allies at a NATO summit in Brussels and the Group of 7 powerful nations in Sicily.
Trump waved from the doorway after Air Force One touched down and before descending the staircase with first lady Melania Trump. The 81-year-old King Salman, who used a cane for support, was brought to the steps of the plane in a golf cart. The leaders exchanged pleasantries and Trump said it was “a great honor” to be there.
Several jets then flew overhead leaving a red, white and blue trail.
Trump is received as an important leader with full honours. Also note that he is bringing the Saudis a $110 billion arms deal and that his next stop is Israel.
Contrast this with the reception of Barack Obama, who wasn’t even received by royalty at the airport, and Hillary Clinton, who was greeted politely but with few honours. I’m guessing that this was because they were lackeys paid to do the bidding of the Saudi Royal Family.
Here’s Obama’s reception in 2016.
And here’s Hillary Clinton’s reception in 2010
The other important figure here is Donald Trump’s son-in-law, who is Jewish and is a very strong advocate for Israel. The Kushner family also own 666 Fifth Avenue, which given how often the occult comes up in our investigations in the financial and political elites has to be suspicious.
This is what Wikipedia has to say.
666 Fifth Avenue is a 41-story office building on Fifth Avenue between 52nd and 53rd Streets in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The office tower was designed by Carson & Lundin and built in 1957 by Tishman Realty and Construction, which sold it when the corporation dissolved in 1976. 666 Fifth Avenue was bought by Sumitomo Realty & Development in the late 1990s, and Tishman Speyer bought it back in 2000, adding tenants before selling it yet again to Kushner Properties in 2007.
And the later.
In September 2017, the Washington Post wrote: “With one-fourth of its offices empty, lease revenue does not cover monthly interest payments, according to lending documents. A $1.2 billion mortgage, with escalating interest rates, comes due in 18 months. A ratings agency has classified a $115 million portion of the loan as ‘troubled,’ and company officials decline to say whether it will be fully repaid.” Due to the large amount of debt owed on the tower, Vornado Realty Trust, which owned 49.5 percent of the tower, said in February 2018 that it planned to sell its stake in the building. Vornado’s stake in the property was subsequently sold to Kushner Cos. on June 1, 2018.
Why would anyone continue to invest in a failing project unless the had other reasons for owning it?
The post relating to Jared Kushner is QAnon 67, published on Nov 3 2017, which reads as follows.
Where is John Podesta?
Where is Tony Podesta?
Did one or both escape the country and was let out?
WHERE IS BO?
WHERE WAS BO YESTERDAY?
What is the difference between commercial and private re: security clearance for departure?
Who is the TSA head?
Which party did he contribute to?
What is of particular interest when researching?
How does HS interact w/ TSA?
What updated post 9-11 protocols were put in place to prevent/stop inbound/outbound C-level targets?
What local airports are in close proximity to DC?
What happened shortly after 9-11 (specifically with all aircraft)?
Who was authorized to depart? ONLY 1 PLANE was authorized during this ‘mandatory forced grounding’.
Who SPECIFICALLY authorized this?
What airport did the departure take place at?
Why is this relevant?
How does it tie together?
Podesta’s plane has military escort (i.e. tag) and is being diverted (forced down).
This will be leaked.
Watch the news.
What fake news anchor will not be on air tonight?
Why is this relevant?
What was stated in the past?
Where did the $18b from Soros go?
Can it be used by bad actors (escape, bribes, rogue contractors, etc.)?
Did the US gov’t seize/stop/track other slush funds that prevent or create risk to operate?
Why did JK travel to SA recently?
What is SA known for?
Where do the biggest donations originate from?
Why is this relevant?
What else is relevant w/ SA?
Port of transfer?
Why was there a recent smear campaign against JK and POTUS?
Why is the timing important?
Who released the article?
The council of Wizards & Warlocks cannot be defeated.
Nice view up here.
Let’s attempt to answer the questions relevant to Jared Kushner
- Why did JK travel to SA recently? Jared Kushner made an unannounced visit to Saudi Arabia in March 2017 in order to cement relations with Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman. This Washington Post article entitled How Jared Kushner forged a bond with the Saudi crown prince outlines how their relationship has developed over the last 18 months.
- What is SA known for? Oil, Wahhabism, bad record on Human Rights and Human Trafficking
- Where do the biggest donations originate from? Often from Saudi Arabia, particularly to Trump’s rivals and enemies.
- Why is this relevant? They do this in order to buy influence and Trump wants to stop that.
- What else is relevant w/ SA? Q is answering his own question here
- Safe harbor? For criminals
- Port of transfer? For human trafficking
- Why was there a recent smear campaign against JK and POTUS? The main topics of the smear campaign are accusations that Prince Mohammad Bin Salman has said he’s got Jared Kushner in his pocket and that the FBI will investigate his links to the Crown Prince
- Why is the timing important? They know that a source of funding/crime operations is about to get taken out
- Who released the article? CNN
I have no doubt that Trump and Kushner are a much better option than Obama and Clinton if only because they are not in the Saudi’s pocket. As is often the case, the CNN accusations were pure projection.
However, I’m not completely convinced that QAnon is a plan to save the world. I think it’s more of a pro-Trump propaganda campaign, which I have no objection to because it’s another way Trump can get round the biased media.
I also have some concerns about the Trump administration’s open support for Israel. I’ve also got some evidence that the House of Saud are in fact crypto-Jews ie. Jewish converts to Islam, which I’ll be presenting in future shows when I’m more certain of the sources. This touches on the questions raised at the end of my last article on the Saudis.
- Why is Wahhabism being inflicted on the West through mass migration and Saudi funding of mosques?
- Was Saudi Arabia created and then enriched and protected for the very purpose of inflicting Wahhabism on the West?
- Who is behind the invention of Wahhabism and the creation of the State of Saudi Arabia?